 |
|
|
The
display device with printer is connected. These, too, may be
easily transported in their aluminium case.
The entire weighing system may be set up in just 5 minutes .
The axle weight is recorded and instantaneously transferred
to the display device via an electronic signal.
The weight value may be read off immediately on the clearly
legible display and printed out.
Optionally, in addition to the axle weight the individual
wheel weights of the axle may be recorded and printed out.
PC connection via interface is also possible. |
|
 |
 |
|
|
| To
achieve optimum weight recording, especially in the case of
double axles, a pair of robust special hard rubber panels
are laid under the second axle. This avoids any measurement
deviations due to height differences between the weighed
axle and the ground surface. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
| Meteor
XXL effortlessly records axle loads up to 24 t (the
smaller Meteor
XL model up to 20 t) with an incremental step of 10
kg. In contrast to the fully steel construction of
the Meteor
XXL, the housing of the smaller Meteor
XL (weighing platform 540 x 340 mm) consists of a
special combination of aluminium and hard rubber
whereby the tare weight per weighing platform
amounts to only 27 kg. Both rugged systems can
withstand overloading by 20 % per weighing unit.
Even in rigorous outdoor use the axle load scales
operate with a precision of +/- 1%. In ideal
implementation conditions precision levels of even
0.2 % are achieved. The results of the field test
lie well within the prescribed precision limit: |
|
 |
|
|
Test 1
with tractor plus rear dump with double axle |
|
 |
| Comparison weight
established on a calibrated, static truck weighbridge:
10,780 kg |
 |
|
|
| Testruns
with Meteor XXL |
Test
results |
Average
deviation in kg |
Average
deviation in % |
Maximum
difference |
| 1 |
10,680 kg |
100 |
0,9 |
60
kg |
| 2 |
10,710 kg |
| 3 |
10,650 kg |
|
| Source: top agrar |
|
|
 |
|
|
Test 2
with tractor plus two-axle trailer |
|
 |
| Comparison weight on
calibrated, static truck weighbridge: 12,380 kg |
 |
|
|
| Testruns
with Meteor XXL |
Test
results |
Average
deviation in kg |
Average
deviation in % |
Maximum
difference |
| 1 |
12,160 kg |
103 |
0,8 |
220
kg |
| 2 |
12,290 kg |
| 3 |
12,380 kg |
|
| Source: top agrar |
|
|
 |
|
|
Verdict:
may be used everywhere and easy to transport, Meteor
XL and Meteor
XXL do exactly what they were designed for: precise
and fast weight recording right where they are
needed.
The reason for using a calibrated static truck
weighbrigde in comparison to a mobile wheel/axle
load scale depends on the application case: |
 |
| - |
when weighing at
different implementation sites, Meteor
weighing systems are ideal for checking weight,
establishing overloading or too heavy loading of
individual axles. Setting up, dismantling and
handling may be performed easily by just one person. |
| - |
a truck weighbridge
calibrated to precision class III is recommended in
the event of a permanent implementation site with
many daily weighing jobs, also external weighing
jobs with invoicing. |
|
 |
|
|
| Photo
and copy: |
|
|
|
 |
|
WVM-gd / Marketing
/ May 2002 |